|
OWI
|
|
|
State v. Wolter, 99-2421-CR
|
|
THE STATUTE IN QUESTION VIOLATES THE DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSES
OF THE UNITED STATES AND WISCONSIN CONSTITUTIONS BECAUSE IT ARBITRARILY AND
IRRATIONALLY PROHIBITS PROBATION FOR INDIVIDUALS CONVICTED OF OPERATING WHILE
UNDER THE INFLUENCE.
|
|       
Go To Brief
            
Go To Decision |
|
|
State v. John A. Holub, 00-1867-CR
|
|
I.
|
THE TRANSPORTATION OF THE DEFENDANT TO THE POLICE STATION FOR FIELD SOBRIETY
TESTS WAS IMPROPER; ACCORDINGLY, ALL EVIDENCE DERIVED AS OF THE POINT OF
TRANSPORT MUST BE SUPPRESSED.
|
|
II.
|
THE EXISTENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE CANNOT SALVAGE THE ILLEGAL EXTENSION OF
THE TERRY STOP BECAUSE OFFICER VIRNIG DID NOT ARREST HOLUB AT THE SCENE.
|
|       
Go To Brief
            
Go To Decision
|
|
|
Causing Injury
|
|
|
State v. Vitatoe, 99-1471-CR
|
|
EVIDENCE THAT MS. VITATOE DROVE AWAY FROM A GAS PUMP "IN A RAPID STATE" WHILE
A MAN WAS LEANING ONE OF HIS ELBOWS ON THE WINDOW OF THE CAR AND YELLING AT
HER THROUGH THE PARTIALLY-OPEN WINDOW, WAS INSUFFICIENT TO PROVE BEYOND A
REASONABLE DOUBT THAT MS. VITATOE WAS CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT IN THE OPERATION OF
A VEHICLE.
|
|       
Go To Brief
            
Go To Decision |
|
|
OAR
|
|
|
State v. Quaerna, 98-2645-CR
|
|
REVOCATION OF MS. QUAERNA'S OPERATING PRIVILEGES FOR AN ACCUMULATION OF DEMERIT
POINTS DID NOT PERMIT THE TRIAL COURT TO IMPOSE CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR OPERATING
AFTER REVOCATION, BECAUSE ALL OF THE DEMERIT POINTS AROSE FROM CONVICTIONS BASED
SOLELY ON SUSPENSIONS FOR FAILURE TO PAY FORFEITURES.
|
|       
Go To Brief
            
Go To Decision |
|
|
State v. Miller, 00-0111-CR
|
|
THE SUSPENSION WAS NOT IN EFFECT WHEN MR. MILLER COMMITTED THE NEW VIOLATION,
THUS THE STATE COULD NOT CHARGE HIM CRIMINALLY BECAUSE MR. MILLER'S OTHER
SUPENSIONS WERE DUE TO FAILURE TO PAY FORFEITURES.
|
|       
Go To Brief
            
Go To Decision |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
State v. Vitatoe, 99-1471-CR
|
|
EVIDENCE THAT MS. VITATOE DROVE AWAY FROM A GAS PUMP "IN A RAPID STATE" WHILE
A MAN WAS LEANING ONE OF HIS ELBOWS ON THE WINDOW OF THE CAR AND YELLING AT HER
THROUGH THE PARTIALLY-OPEN WINDOW, WAS INSUFFICIENT TO PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE
DOUBT THAT MS. VITATOE WAS CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT IN THE OPERATION OF A VEHICLE.
|
|       
Go To Brief
            
Go To Decision |
|
|
State v. Charles A. Wallace, a/k/a LaShawn Thomas, 00-3524-CR
|
|
I.
|
THE POLICE UNLAWFULLY DETAINED WALLACE WHEN THEY CONTINUED TO DETAIN HIM AFTER
CITING HIM FOR UNLAWFUL LICENSE PLATES, AND AFTER HE POSTED BOND.
|
|
II.
|
AFTER RECEIVING A CITATION FOR UNLAWFUL PLATES ON HIS CAR, AND AS WILLIAMS
WAS POSTING BOND FOR HIM, WALLACE DID NOT VOLUNTARILY CONSENT TO A STRIP SEARCH,
INCLUDING THE REQUIREMENT THAT HE REMOVE HIS PANTS AND UNDERWEAR, BEND OVER,
AND SPREAD HIS BUTTOCKS, AND THE POLICE LACKED THE AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT SUCH A SEARCH.
|
|
III.
|
THE EVIDENCE DISCOVERED AS A RESULT OF THE STRIP SEARCH, AND SUBSEQUENT
STATEMENTS, SHOULD BE SUPPRESSED.
|
|
|
|       
Go To Brief
            
Go To Decision |
|